IFRS reporting “doesn’t actually add very much to the view of the company,” according to Robin Freestone
The CFO of publishing giant Pearson was speaking at the ICAEW Financial Reporting Faculty’s annual IRFS conference this morning, where he raised concerns over how accurately the international standards gave a true representation of a business.
Freestone, number 16 in the economia Finance Global 50, said he had “strategic concerns” about the international standards IFRS. He went as far as to say that IFRS was “pretty unhelpful” when it came to trying to assess a company.
“I feel increasingly we are doing an awful lot of work to meet technical requirements rather than to do anything that’s helping to improve understanding about the company,” he said. “IFRS reporting, while being technically brilliant, doesn’t actually add very much to the view of the company.”
He said the accounts were “not helpful” to investors or shareholders when assessing what is going on within a company, and that he questioned the cost of having “halls of accountants doing lots of spreadsheets”.
“And then when we come out with these brilliant, technically accurate accounts, I wonder if anyone is actually using them?” he asked. “Managers aren’t using them, and investors aren’t using them.
“I’m just not convinced that all the technical accounting going on is really adding to the debate.”
Ruth Picker, global head of IFRS at Ernst & Young, defended the international standards. “I think what the IASB would say to that is, “It’s all very well to ask for simpler standards, but the truth is that business is complex and it’s hard to write simple standards for a complex business,” she told delegates.
The conference opened with an update from Bob Herz, former chair of the FASB, who said everything was going “swimmingly” in terms of convergence between US GAAP and IFRS, when the global financial crisis happened.
“In 2006 and 07, and even into 2008, there was a lot of enthusiasm about IFRS,” said Herz. “But, I think because of the financial crisis and the inability of the two boards to come to common solutions, that appetite has waned significantly in the US.”
He added that the two boards (the IASB and the FASB) had “not been able to agree on a lot lately,” and warned that delegates should not expect any solutions to be reached quickly.
Freestone said he was pleased to hear that the convergence objective was not “dead,” but raised questions over implementing the standards “without the US on board.”
Concerns were also raised over the nature of annual reports. Freestone said they were increasingly “full of stuff people don’t want to know”.
Picker said that it had been 10 years since the work began to combine the US GAAP and IFRS. “Should the US ever decide to adopt IFRS the cost will be reduced by virtue of those 10 years,” she said.
Bill Hicks, interim director of group reporting at the BBC, called for the standard setters to engage with the users of the standards, saying the prepares should be shifted up from “inform” to “consult.”
He also attacked the quality of auditors, saying, “I do not think the quality of training is good enough in this country or around the world for accountants.
“Most auditors I come across do not have the skill set, do not understand cash flow, and that is a serious problem,” said Hicks.
From the audience, Paul Druckman CEO of the International Integrated Reporting Council, also in the economia Global Finance 50, rejected the claims for being “a little harsh”.
IASB and FRC criticise SEC over IFRS delay
The Global Finance 50
IFRS in the US moves a step closer
Setting the standard: accepting IFRS